I have been given clearance to reveal that the reason the PGOU meeting had to be cancelled was that an opposition politician (forbidden to reveal who) had taken out a denuncia against the Mayor in the mistaken belief that it was an election meeting (which it obviously was not). Why any politician would think that such an action would endear their party to them is a complete mystery to me as it is everyones interest in Zurgena to progress this. So all that it has done is deny residents the opportunity to get an overview of the plan and an explanation from the architect.
The consultation period for the PGOU will be starting either today or tomorrow, although any request to examine it yet may cause difficulties, as the documents have not yet been digitised and uploaded to the Town Hall website. As soon as it is I will post on here.
Additionally I need to get a more in-depth explanation to help people understand what it all means and I have asked whether the Architect can meet with me as part of the process to communicate this information.
This acts are illegal, they damage the electoral law
ReplyDeleteRecord of Electoral Together Resolution, TO PROHIBIT ACT OF PRESENTATION, which damages art. 50.2 LOREG: From the call to celebration elections, it remains prohibited acts organized or financed by the public powers, that it contains allusions to the achievements or to achievements to which it uses images or coincidental expressions to the used ones in its own campaigns.
ReplyDelete